Medical Policy |
Subject: Autologous Cell Sheet-Based Gene Therapy for Treatment of Dystrophic Epidermolysis Bullosa | |
Document #: SURG.00163 | Publish Date: 08/21/2025 |
Status: Revised | Last Review Date: 08/07/2025 |
Description/Scope |
This document addresses the use of autologous cell sheet-based gene therapy for the treatment of wounds caused by recessive dystrophic epidermolysis bullosa (RDEB), for example prademagene zamikeracel (Zevaskyn™ [formerly pz-cel and EB-101], Abeona Therapeutics, Inc., Cleveland, OH).
Note: Please be aware that use of bioengineered autologous skin-derived products (for example, SkinTE®, MyOwn Skin™) are not addressed in this document. See the following related documents for additional information:
Position Statement |
Medically Necessary:
Application of autologous cell sheet-based gene therapy (prademagene zamikeracel) is considered medically necessary when all of the following criteria are met:
Subsequent application of autologous cell sheet-based gene therapy (prademagene zamikeracel), to previously untreated wounds, is considered medically necessary when all the criteria above have been met.
Investigational and Not Medically Necessary:
Autologous cell sheet-based gene therapy (prademagene zamikeracel) is considered investigational and not medically necessary when the criteria above are not met.
Rationale |
Summary
The FDA approved prademagene zamikeracel in April 2025 as a treatment for wounds associated with RDEB. The pivotal phase 3 VIITAL trial demonstrated significant improvement in wound healing and pain reduction 24 weeks after a single application. While long-term durability beyond 6 months is being evaluated through extended follow-up, prior phase 1/2a results have shown sustained clinical benefit for up to 8 years in a subset of treated wounds. This therapy offers a potential option for individuals with wounds that are refractory to other treatments such as topical gene or botanical therapies.
Discussion
Prademagene zamikeracel is an ex vivo autologous gene-corrected epidermal skin graft product designed to correct a defect in the COL7A1 gene for individuals with RDEB. Mutation of COL7A1 prevents individuals with recessive RDEB from producing Type VII collagen. As a result, this often-fatal condition is characterized by severe blisters and non-healing wounds, especially on sites with a high probability of sheering or friction. Prademagene zamikeracel was granted Regenerative Medicine Advanced Therapy, Breakthrough Therapy, Orphan Drug, Priority Review and Rare Pediatric Disease designations by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). On April 29, 2025, the FDA approved the therapeutic use of prademagene zamikeracel as an autologous cell sheet-based gene therapy indicated for the treatment of wounds with RDEB, in both adults and children (FDA Product Information [PI Label], 2025). Treatment is limited to up to six wounds per individual in a single session. The grafts contain basal keratinocytes capable of long-term regeneration, which may contribute to sustained benefit at treated sites.
In 2016, Siprashvili and colleagues evaluated the safety and efficacy of prademagene zamikeracel in individuals with RDEB. This single-center, phase 1 clinical trial (NCT01263379) enrolled 4 individuals diagnosed with severe RDEB and wounds measuring at least 100 cm2 that were suitable for grafting. Autologous keratinocytes were isolated from two 8 mm biopsy samples and were transduced with retrovirus carrying full-length human COL7A1. These were then assembled into epidermal sheet grafts. Type VII collagen gene-corrected grafts (approximately 35 cm2) were transplanted onto 6 wounds in each of the 4 enrolled individuals (a total of 24 grafts). The primary safety outcomes were recombination competent retrovirus, cancer, and autoimmune reactions. Molecular correction was assessed as type VII collagen expression measured by immunofluorescence and immunoelectron microscopy. Wound healing was assessed using serial photographs taken at 3, 6, and 12 months after grafting. The 4 participants (mean age, 23 years [range, 18-32 years]) were all born male with an estimated affected body surface area with recessive RDEB ranging from 4% to 30%. All 24 grafts were well tolerated without serious adverse events. Type VII collagen expression at the dermal-epidermal junction was demonstrated on the graft sites in 9 of 10 biopsy samples (90%) at 3 months, in 8 of 12 samples (66%) at 6 months, and in 5 of 12 samples (42%) at 12 months, including correct type VII collagen localization to anchoring fibrils. Wounds with recombinant type VII collagen graft sites displayed 75% or greater healing at 3 months (21 intact graft sites of 24 wound sites; 87%), 6 months (16/24; 67%), and 12 months (12/24; 50%) compared with baseline wound sites. The authors concluded that, while there was wound healing in some type VII collagen gene-corrected grafts, the response was variable among participants and among grafted sites with declining healing over 1 year. They recommended further investigation, in particular with respect to graft durability.
In 2019, Eichstadt and colleagues published additional results from NCT01263379 evaluating 2-year efficacy and safety outcomes of prademagene zamikeracel in 7 individuals with recessive RDEB, including the 4 individuals for whom 1-year outcomes were reported by Siprashvili as described above. As in the pilot study, the gene-corrected autologous epidermal sheets were grown to 35 cm2. Grafts were transplanted onto 6 wound sites in each of the 7 adult participants (a total of 42 grafts). The mean age of the cohort was just under 29 years (range 18-45). Graft recipients were followed for 2 to 5 years. No serious graft-related adverse events were reported during this time. Wound healing of 50% or greater (measured via Investigator Global Assessment) was present in 95% (36 of 38) of treated wounds versus 0% (0 of 6) of untreated control wounds at 6 months (p<0.0001). At year 1, 68% (26 of 38) of treated wounds had 50% or greater healing compared with 17% (1 of 6) of control wounds (p=0.025). At year 2, 71% (27 of 38) of treated wounds had 50% or greater healing compared with 17% (1 of 6) of control wounds (p=0.019). Sustained expression of corrected type VII collagen persisted up to 2 years after treatment in 2 participants. Wounds with 50% or greater healing demonstrated improvement in reported pain and itchiness. Wounds that were very large (> 100 cm2) and/or very old (16 years or older) were less likely to demonstrate successful molecular correction. Wounds in areas difficult to protect from shearing demonstrated less ability to heal. All 7 participants reported satisfaction with the treatment and expressed interest in undergoing additional therapy.
In 2022, So and colleagues published results of continued follow-up from NCT01263379. The cohort of 7 adult participants continued to be followed for a mean of 5.9 years (range 4-8 years). At year 5, 70% (21/30) of treated sites demonstrated ≥ 50% wound healing compared to baseline. No sites with ≥ 50% wound healing were painful or pruritic, compared to 67% (6/9) of sites with < 50% wound healing (p<0.001) at year 5. Grafts continued to be well-tolerated, and no serious adverse events related to treatment were reported. No persistent systemic autoimmunity against type VII collagen or replication-competent retrovirus infections were identified, and no participants developed squamous cell carcinomas related to treatment during long-term follow-up. Measurement of expression of full-length collagen type VII within grafts was not performed beyond year 2. The authors concluded that prademagene zamikeracel “appears safe and efficacious, and produces long-term improvements in wound healing, pain, and itch for RDEB patients.” Further investigation in the setting of a randomized clinical trial is warranted.
In 2020, a phase 3 randomized trial, VIITAL trial, commenced and enrolled participants 6 years of age and up (n=11) treated with prademagene zamikeracel graft application and followed through 24 weeks (NCT04227106). Participants were qualified for inclusion if the following study criteria were met:
Clinical trial study participants were also required to verify absence of the following exclusion criteria:
The VIITAL trial (NCT04227106) reached primary completion in 2022 with results published in 2025 (Tang, et al). The RCT enrolled 11 individuals (86 wounds [43 treated wounds; 43 control wounds]) with a median age of 21 and an age range of 6 to 40 years (interquartile range 17 to 30). The pediatric population in this study consisted of 2 participants, ages 6 and 16. The trial was conducted at two independent academic medical centers. The first primary outcome of this trial was to evaluate wound healing, specifically focusing on the percentage of RDEB wound sites achieving at least 50% healing from the baseline in wounds treated with prademagene zamikeracel compared to those receiving standard care. Investigators assessed wound healing 24 weeks after treatment. Out of 43 prademagene zamikeracel treated wounds, 35 (81%) experienced over 50% healing. In contrast, only 7 (16%) of the 43 wounds treated with standard care showed more than 50% healing (p<0.0001). Another primary outcome of this trial was an assessment of how pain decreased during wound dressing changes. This was measured by comparing the average difference in scores on the Wong-Baker FACES scale between wounds that received the treatment and those managed with standard care. Pain reduction was evaluated by comparing the level of pain felt 24 weeks after treatment to the initial pain levels before treatment began. The Wong-Baker FACES scale ranges from 0 to 10, with higher scores indicating more pain, as reported by participants. The trial reported that pain during dressing changes for treated wounds fell by an average of 3.07 (standard deviation [SD] 3.19), whereas for wounds treated with standard care, the reduction was only 0.9 (SD 2.73) (p=0.0002). Some secondary outcomes showed significant improvement in the wounds treated with the proportion completely healed from baseline to Month 3 (6 vs. 0; p=0.032) and the proportion completely healed at Month 6 (7 vs. 0; p=0.016). The median number of sheets administered was 6 (range 3-6). The most common adverse reactions (over 5% of participants) were procedural pain (n=3) and pruritis (n=1). Serious adverse events were experienced by 2 of the 11 participants. These included 3 wound infections, 1 occurrence of squamous cell skin cancer, and 1 toe amputation. The investigators report an intention to monitor outcomes annually for up to 15 years and the label indicates lifelong monitoring for malignancies is warranted. FDA approval was based on the pivotal phase 3 VIITAL trial.
Warnings, Precautions, Dosage and Administration,
Warnings and precautions from the FDA PI Label (2025) include the following:
Dosage and administration guidance from the FDA PI Label (2025) include the following:
Therapeutic application of prademagene zamikeracel begins with harvesting grafts from 2, 8mm punch biopsy sites from healthy, non-blistered areas on affected individuals. Local anesthesia is typically administered. The biopsied skin cells are genetically corrected then expanded for grafting back onto the individual’s wound sites. This process spans a period of 3 to 4 weeks. Once the sheets are ready for application, the individual undergoes an operation under general anesthesia which typically lasts between 5 to 7 hours. Graft recipients remain in the hospital for about 1 week to receive supportive care and monitoring for signs of complications. Due to the specialized nature of manufacturing, surgical application, and post-operative management, prademagene zamikeracel must be administered in a qualified treatment center.
In May of 2023, the FDA approved the in vivo topical gene-based therapy beremagene geperpavec (Vyjuvek®, Krystal Biotech, Inc.). Bermagene geperpavec is formulated with a modified herpes virus. It is applied as a topical gel to directly treat wounds in individuals 6 months of age and older with dystrophic epidermolysis bullosa (DEB) with mutations in the COL7A1 gene. This treatment does not require any surgical procedures. Beremagene geperpavec has wider application than prademagene zamikeracel, with treatment indications including both the recessive and dominant forms of DEB. Beremagene geperpavec is typically applied in an outpatient setting or at home on a weekly basis (FDA PI Label, 2023). Beremagene geperpavec was approved based on results from a double-blind intrapatient randomized placebo-controlled trial that enrolled 31 individuals. At 6 months, 67% of treated wounds achieved complete healing (primary outcome), compared to 22% of placebo wounds (p=0.002). The DEB genotype of the enrolled population was 97% RDEB (n=30) and 3% dominant DEB (n=1). No serious, treatment-related events were reported. The most common adverse events were pruritis, chills and squamous-cell carcinoma of the skin, each of which occurred at a rate of 10% (n=3, each) (Guide, 2022).
Background/Overview |
Recessive dystrophic epidermolysis bullosa (RDEB) is an ‘ultra-rare’ (3.5-20.4 per million), severe, inherited blistering skin disease caused by the absence of a protein known as type VII collagen. It is potentially fatal as a result of wound complications. There is no approved curative treatment for RDEB; only supportive care is currently possible through the prevention of new blisters along with wound care (Pope, 2012).
Prademagene zamikeracel uses a retroviral vector to integrate collagen type VII alpha 1 chain (COL7A1) into the dividing target cell genome for long-term gene expression. To begin the therapy, each graft is harvested from 2 8mm biopsy sites from affected individuals and genetically corrected then expanded for grafting back onto the individual’s wound sites.
In May of 2023, the FDA approved a topical gene therapy (Vyjuvek) formulated with a modified herpes virus for the treatment of wounds in individuals 6 months of age and older with dystrophic epidermolysis bullosa (DEB) with mutation(s) in the COL7A1 gene. In December of the same year, the FDA approved another topical therapy (Filsuvez), a botanical drug product containing birch triterpenes for the treatment of partial thickness wounds associated with dystrophic and junctional epidermolysis in individuals 6 months of age or older.
Definitions |
Autologous cell therapy (ACT): A medical treatment involving the transplantation of various types of cells harvested from the individual and then returned to them in a unique manner. This treatment may involve one or several types of cells and has been proposed for a wide variety of conditions.
Regenerative therapy: A cell therapy, therapeutic tissue engineering product, human cell and tissue product, or any combination product using such therapies or products that intends to modify, treat, reverse, or cure a disease or condition by contributing, inducing or promoting tissue healing. Regenerative therapies purport to promote the growth and division of repair cells or mediate the inflammatory process associated with an injury or disease, or produce a regenerative effect via their direct incorporation into injured tissue and adjacent tissue.
Stage 2 wound: A partial-thickness wound involving the epidermis and superficial dermis, with an open red or pink wound bed and no slough.
Coding |
The following codes for treatments and procedures applicable to this document are included below for informational purposes. Inclusion or exclusion of a procedure, diagnosis or device code(s) does not constitute or imply member coverage or provider reimbursement policy. Please refer to the member's contract benefits in effect at the time of service to determine coverage or non-coverage of these services as it applies to an individual member.
When services may be Medically Necessary when criteria are met:
For the following procedure codes, or when the code describes a procedure indicated in the Position Statement section as medically necessary.
CPT |
|
17999 |
Unlisted procedure, skin, mucous membrane and subcutaneous tissue [when specified as application of prademagene zamikeracel, genetically engineered autologous cell therapy] |
|
|
HCPCS |
|
C9399 |
Unclassified drugs or biologicals [when specified as prademagene zamikeracel] |
J3590 |
Unclassified biologics [when specified as prademagene zamikeracel] |
|
|
ICD-10 Procedure |
|
XHR0XGA |
Replacement of head and neck skin with prademagene zamikeracel, genetically engineered autologous cell therapy, external approach, New Technology Group 10 |
XHR1XGA |
Replacement of chest skin with prademagene zamikeracel, genetically engineered autologous cell therapy, external approach, New Technology Group 10 |
XHR2XGA |
Replacement of abdomen skin with prademagene zamikeracel, genetically engineered autologous cell therapy, external approach, New Technology Group 10 |
XHR3XGA |
Replacement of back skin with prademagene zamikeracel, genetically engineered autologous cell therapy, external approach, New Technology Group 10 |
XHR4XGA |
Replacement of right upper extremity skin with prademagene zamikeracel, genetically engineered autologous cell therapy, external approach, New Technology Group 10 |
XHR5XGA |
Replacement of left upper extremity skin prademagene zamikeracel, genetically engineered autologous cell therapy, external approach, New Technology Group 10 |
XHR6XGA |
Replacement of right lower extremity skin with prademagene zamikeracel, genetically engineered autologous cell therapy, external approach, New Technology Group 10 |
XHR7XGA |
Replacement of left lower extremity skin with prademagene zamikeracel, genetically engineered autologous cell therapy, external approach, New Technology Group 10 |
|
|
ICD-10 Diagnosis |
|
Q81.2 |
Epidermolysis bullosa dystrophica |
When services are Investigational and Not Medically Necessary:
For the procedure codes listed above when criteria are not met.
References |
Peer Reviewed Publications:
Government Agency, Medical Society, and Other Authoritative Publications:
Websites for Additional Information |
Index |
Zevaskyn
The use of specific product names is illustrative only. It is not intended to be a recommendation of one product over another, and is not intended to represent a complete listing of all products available.
Document History |
Status |
Date |
Action |
Revised |
08/07/2025 |
Medical Policy & Technology Assessment Committee (MPTAC) review. Revised Position Statement to include MN criteria. Revised Rationale, Background/Overview, Definitions, Coding, References and Websites for Additional Information sections. |
New |
05/08/2025 |
MPTAC review. Initial document development. |
Preliminary Discussion |
02/15/2024 |
MPTAC pre-FDA approval review. |
Federal and State law, as well as contract language, including definitions and specific contract provisions/exclusions, take precedence over Medical Policy and must be considered first in determining eligibility for coverage. The member’s contract benefits in effect on the date that services are rendered must be used. Medical Policy, which addresses medical efficacy, should be considered before utilizing medical opinion in adjudication. Medical technology is constantly evolving, and we reserve the right to review and update Medical Policy periodically.
No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, or otherwise, without permission from the health plan.
© CPT Only - American Medical Association